Important Dates in the Lives of Jesus and Mary 
his place among the gods. For this reason, ancient coins and images of Julius Caesar often show a comet 
above his head. 
    How can modern astronomy determine which comets appeared when in ancient times? For the most part, it 
cannot; however, independent verification of comet sightings is provided by ancient Chinese and Korean 
astronomers, who observed the stars closely and kept careful records of the date and location of comets. Since 
the ancient Chinese calendar system (a lunar calendar) is unrelated to the 
B.C.
/
A.D.
 system, this provides a 
way to verify the sightings mentioned by the Roman historians. 
    The best modern source for information on these ancient comet sightings is undoubtedly  Cometography, A 
Catalog of Comets, Volume 1, by Gary W. Kronk. This book covers every ancient comet from 675 
B.C.
 to 
A.D.
1799, and consolidates all of the often quoted sources for ancient comet data, such as the  Hou Han shu (an 
ancient Chinese text), J. Williams, Ho Peng Yoke, A. G. Pingre, and others. Treatment is even given to brief 
mentions of comets found in ancient Roman texts. 
    Comets are typically visible (with the naked eye) for a period of a few days or weeks to, at most, several 
months. They travel in an arc around the sun and should be visible, at some point in their path, from both 
Europe and China. Thus, any noted comet in Roman history would likely have been observed and mentioned 
by the ancient astronomers of China. It should then be possible, in a given chronology for dates in the reigns of 
Roman emperors, to match the mention of comets in Roman texts to those in Chinese texts. Comet data is 
examined in chapter 13 of this book, along with a revised chronology of the reigns of the Roman emperors in 
the first century 
A.D.
Scholars Are Uncertain 
    In 525 
A.D.
, Pope St. John I, asked a Roman Catholic abbot named Dionysius Exiguus to determine the 
dates of Easter for future years. Dionysius was a well known theologian, who also excelled at mathematics 
and astronomy. The date for Easter is determined by astronomy.
14
 In determining these dates, Dionysius 
objected to the then current system of numbering the years from the time of the emperor Diocletian, (third 
century 
A.D.
), under whose reign there was a great persecution of Christians.
15
 Instead, he devised a calendar 
system where the years are numbered according to the Incarnation of Jesus Christ, ab incarnatione Domini 
(`from the Incarnation of the Lord').
16
 Today, we use the abbreviation  
A.D.
,  which stands for Anno Domini 
(`in the year of the Lord'), but the numbering of the years is according to Dionysius.
17
    Dionysius numbered the first full year after the Incarnation and Birth of Christ as 
A.D.
 1. Thus, in 
A.D.
 1, 
according to Dionysius, Christ would have completed one year of life since the Incarnation (early in the 
calendar year), and one year of life since His Holy Birth (late in the calendar year). The number of the year 
should reflect the age of Christ in this system. The custom of referring to the years before 
A.D.
 1 as  
B.C.
  
(`before Christ') did not develop until a later time. However, Dionysius did believe that Christ was born in the 
year before 
A.D.
 1, which we now call 1 
B.C.
    Even though this new system of numbering the years was accepted by the Church, and by much of society, 
there is today no agreement among historians, Biblical scholars, theologians, or Church leaders that Dionysius 
chose the correct year to call 
A.D.
 1. In other words, there is no general agreement that Christ was born in 1 
B.C.
 It is not the official teaching of the Catholic Church, nor of any other Christian Church of which I am 
aware, that Jesus Christ was necessarily born in 1 
B.C.
, as was the opinion of Dionysius. 
    Since hundreds of years had passed between the Birth of Christ and the time of Dionysius, he could well 
have been mistaken about which year was the year of Christ's Birth. Also, he numbered the years as his 
reference point using the Roman dating system A.U.C.,  ab urbe condita, (from the founding of the city of 
Rome). So, any errors in the Roman system of dating the years would have affected his determination as to in 
which year Christ was born. As we shall see in chapter 13 of this book, Dionysius would have been correct as 
to the year of Christ's Birth, except for some errors in the Roman histories upon which Dionysius depended. 
The Teaching of the Church 
    The Catholic Church has no official teaching as to the year of the Birth or Crucifixion of Jesus Christ. And, 
even though we celebrate the Birth of Jesus Christ on December 25, the Church does not teach that this was 
16






footer




 

 

 

 

 Home | About Us | Network | Services | Support | FAQ | Control Panel | Order Online | Sitemap | Contact

catholic web hosting

 

Our partners: PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor Best Web Hosting Java Web Hosting Inexpensive Web Hosting  Jsp Web Hosting

Cheapest Web Hosting Jsp Hosting Cheap Hosting

Visionwebhosting.net Business web hosting division of Web Design Plus. All rights reserved