Important Dates in the Lives of Jesus and Mary 
and Augustus' reigns. In looking for an August 1 eclipse, he inevitably decided upon the 
A.D.
 45 eclipse, since 
it was the only one that fit his time frame for Claudius' reign. 
    But why was Claudius concerned enough about a possible future solar eclipse to inquire of Roman scholars 
when the next one would occur? Dio states only that  some other portents had already occurred. 
937
 In the 
usual chronology, there were no other solar eclipses visible from the Roman Empire for more than a year 
previous to the August 1, 
A.D.
 45 eclipse. But in the revised chronology, there was a solar eclipse visible from 
Rome on Feb. 6 of 
A.D.
 26. This eclipse occurred only a couple of weeks after Claudius became emperor. This 
first eclipse of 
A.D.
 26 was a partial solar eclipse that was visible from Rome at, and well after, dawn. This 
impressive eclipse would have been seen by the Roman people as an omen associated with the reign of 
Claudius, because it occurred so soon after he became emperor. Thus, the revised chronology offers a clear 
explanation as to why Claudius consulted scholars about future solar eclipses in the first place. 
    The first solar eclipse (Feb. 6 of 
A.D.
 26) caused a stir among the Roman people, who were quite 
superstitious about eclipses. This caused Claudius to inquire when the next solar eclipse would occur. When 
Roman scholars informed Claudius of a second solar eclipse later that year, and one coinciding with his 
birthday, he became concerned about how the Roman people would interpret such an omen. For this reason, 
he issued his famous proclamation about the eclipse, in an attempt to prevent people from interpreting that 
eclipse as also an omen against him. Now, if the eclipse mentioned in the proclamation had actually been 
visible from the Roman Empire, a proclamation by the emperor would not have been likely to cause the 
Roman people as a whole to abandon their belief that celestial events are meaningful omens. Yet Dio 
mentions no reaction by anyone to the eclipse of the proclamation. The August 1, 
A.D.
 45 eclipse was visible 
from Rome and much of the Empire, but the August 1, 
A.D.
 26 eclipse was not visible from the Roman 
Empire, but only from central and southern Africa. The reason there is no mention by Dio of any reaction to 
the eclipse is that it was not visible to the Roman people. The revised chronology can explain why Claudius 
sought information about a future solar eclipse (his reaction to the Feb. eclipse) and can explain the lack of any 
response from the Roman people after the August eclipse (it was not visible to them). The usual chronology 
offers no explanation of either of these points. 
Nero's Comets 
    Tacitus mentions two comet sightings during the reign of Nero.  A brilliant comet now appeared. 
938
 This 
sighting is described alongside the events usually placed in 
A.D.
 60; my revised date for this comet sighting is 
A.D.
 46. There are recorded comet sightings from Chinese and Korean astronomers in 
A.D.
 60, and from 
Korean astronomers only in 
A.D.
 46.
939
    The poet Seneca describes a comet during the reign of Nero, when Paterculus and Vopiscus were consuls, 
usually dated to 
A.D.
 60. This comet began in the north, passed through the west, and ended in the southern 
sky.
940
 The path of this comet is similar to the comet described by Chinese astronomers for the year 
A.D.
 60, 
which was first observed in the northeast and last seen in the southern sky.
941
    My revised date for this comet sighting is 
A.D.
 46. Korean astronomers recorded a comet sighting in the 
southern sky in 
A.D.
 46.
942
 This location matches the final location of the comet described by Seneca. More 
details are available from the Chinese astronomers about the 
A.D.
 60 comet, but the available information for 
the 
A.D.
 46 comet does not conflict with any details given by Seneca. The description given by Seneca could 
refer to either the 
A.D.
 46 or the 
A.D.
 60 comet.  
  
    Tacitus reports a second comet a few years later, at the end of the year of the burning of Rome, (
A.D.
 64, 
usual; 
A.D.
 49, revised).
943
 Tacitus does not give many details about this comet, but he does tells us that this 
comet was  atoned for by Nero, as usual, by aristocratic blood . 
944
 The phrase `as usual' indicates Nero had 
previously killed members of the aristocracy in reaction to a comet or other celestial sign. Thus, Nero most 
likely killed members of the aristocracy in response to both comets. 
    There was a sighting recorded in 
A.D.
 64 by Chinese astronomers, which was thought to be either a comet 
or a nova (a new star). This object did not have a visible tail, hence the dispute as to whether it was a comet or 
a nova. It was seen from early May to mid July, in 
A.D.
 64. This comet or nova does not fit the description 
given by Tacitus of the second comet during Nero's reign. Tacitus tells us that the fire that destroyed Rome 
204






footer




 

 

 

 

 Home | About Us | Network | Services | Support | FAQ | Control Panel | Order Online | Sitemap | Contact

catholic web hosting

 

Our partners: PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor Best Web Hosting Java Web Hosting Inexpensive Web Hosting  Jsp Web Hosting

Cheapest Web Hosting Jsp Hosting Cheap Hosting

Visionwebhosting.net Business web hosting division of Web Design Plus. All rights reserved