Important Dates in the Lives of Jesus and Mary 
    Eusebius also tells us that the faithful of Rome not only  resorted to appeals of every kind,  but also did not 
 let him go till they had persuaded him. 
637
 Where was Mark going that the faithful of Rome should detain 
him until he agreed to write the Gospel? Clearly Mark intended to go on a long journey, for if it were a short 
journey, the faithful of Rome would not have been so anxious to have the Gospel in writing. Could this 
journey have been one of Peter's missionary journeys to those places mentioned in 1 Peter 1:1 (modern day 
Turkey)? No, if Mark did not accompany Peter, because the faithful had already persuaded him before Peter 
departed, then Peter would have known that Mark was writing the Gospel, which was not the case. 
Furthermore, Peter certainly returned to Rome after journeying to various places to preach Christ. If Mark had 
journeyed with Peter, he also would have returned, so that the faithful would not have been so anxious to have 
his teaching in writing. 
    Where did Mark intend to go after he wrote the Gospel? Mark likely intended to go on a long journey 
without Peter, a journey from which he might not return. For this reason, the faithful of Rome were anxious to 
persuade him to write the Gospel. Eusebius wrote that they sought to convince Mark  to leave them in writing 
a summary of the instruction they had received by word of mouth. 
638
 This phrasing indicates that Mark 
intended to go somewhere distant and perhaps never return, so that the faithful would no longer have access to 
Mark's teaching by his spoken words. Since Peter was away on a long journey of his own, and Mark was 
about to depart also, the faithful of Rome wanted Peter and Mark's teaching in writing. In this way, the 
Gospel of Mark came to be written. 
    Mark did make a long journey from which he did not return; he traveled to Egypt to preach the Gospel. 
 So, taking the gospel which he himself composed, he went to Egypt and first preaching Christ at Alexandria 
he formed a church so admirable in doctrine and continence of living that he constrained all followers of 
Christ to his example. 
639
 Mark completed his Gospel before going to Egypt, and, after preaching there for 
many years, he suffered a martyr's death. Mark's Gospel was written sometime before Mark traveled to Egypt. 
One possibility, then, is that the faithful of Rome delayed Mark's missionary journey to Egypt by convincing 
him to first write the Gospel of Mark. 
    It is not possible that Mark's missionary journey of Acts 15:39 was the journey delayed by the writing of the 
Gospel. Just prior to that time, Peter was in Jerusalem for a Council of the Church (
A.D.
 35:1 21). A journey 
to Rome with Peter could not have been the journey which Mark delayed taking in order to write the Gospel, 
because then Peter would have known that Mark was kept from journeying with him in order to write the 
Gospel, which was not the case. Thus the delayed journey could not have been one which Peter and Mark 
intended to take together, but rather one which Mark intended to take alone (and one from which he was not 
likely to return). 
    Nor was the delayed journey the one where Mark joined Barnabas in traveling from Antioch to Cyprus 
(Acts 15:39). Mark is not mentioned in the earlier passage about the Council, but Paul and Barnabas are 
mentioned (Acts 15:1 21). Mark does not seem to have been with Paul and Barnabas at this time. He is also 
not mentioned in the subsequent passage, the one that names those sent to Antioch (Acts 15:22 35). More 
significantly, Paul and Barnabas were in Antioch for some length of time teaching before they decided to set 
out on a missionary journey. Yet Paul would not accept Mark to accompany them on that journey. Paul's 
reason for not accepting Mark was that Mark had  withdrawn from them in Pamphylia, and had not gone 
with them to the work.  (Acts 15:38). If Mark had been teaching and serving along with Paul and Barnabas in 
Antioch, Paul would have been very unlikely to reject Mark for withdrawing and not doing the work of 
spreading the Gospel. If Paul had accepted Mark to preach with them in Antioch, then he would have 
accepted Mark to preach with them elsewhere. On this basis, I conclude that Mark was not at the Council in 
Jerusalem with Peter, nor did he spend much time with Paul and Barnabas in Antioch. Rather, Mark was 
elsewhere and came to Antioch at a later time, about the time that Paul and Barnabas were planning another 
journey. This journey most likely occurred in spring of 
A.D.
 36, rather than late 
A.D.
 35. Paul and Barnabas 
spent time in Jerusalem in 
A.D.
 35 for the Council. Then they spent much time in Antioch preaching so 
much time that it seemed to them a break from their missionary journeys, and thus did they decide to begin 
missionary journeys anew, as Acts 15:36 tells us. The spring would be a likely time to begin traveling again, 
after wintering in Antioch. Thus, Mark was in Antioch in early 
A.D.
 36, but he was probably not in Jerusalem 
or Antioch in 
A.D.
 35. 
152






footer




 

 

 

 

 Home | About Us | Network | Services | Support | FAQ | Control Panel | Order Online | Sitemap | Contact

catholic web hosting

 

Our partners: PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor Best Web Hosting Java Web Hosting Inexpensive Web Hosting  Jsp Web Hosting

Cheapest Web Hosting Jsp Hosting Cheap Hosting

Visionwebhosting.net Business web hosting division of Web Design Plus. All rights reserved